A lone figure
stands on a dead planet, gazing solemnly at the spacecraft which brought him here,
now flying away. As the mothership soars into the stratosphere, the being—a
tall, hairless biped with chalk-white skin and uncannily human features—removes
his cloak and drinks an oozing, shifting black liquid. In seconds, the compound
brings him to his knees, painfully rending him apart at the molecular level
until the humanoid tumbles down the adjacent waterfall and dissolves among the
rocks below. But from this individual’s agonizing death comes a glimpse of
something new. Decayed DNA strands reanimate, one cell splits into another,
then another. Like seeds cast into the wind, life spreads.
So begins Prometheus, Ridley Scott’s semiprequel
to his 1979 blockbuster—and my all time favourite movie—Alien. I specify “semiprequel” because Scott himself has been
wishy-washy about where it sits in the Alien
continuum. While it’s set in the same fictional universe, it focuses not on
the series’ eponymous monsters but on a species only glimpsed in the original
film. It’s a much grander movie, featuring a more cosmic and existential brand
of horror than that of its darkly sexual proto-slasher progenitor. It’s 2001: A Space Odyssey by way of Alien and John Carpenter’s The Thing, and with a touch of H.P.
Lovecraft to boot; in other words, everything I could ever ask for, give or
take some concerns I have with the finished product.
A few years
after Shaw’s discovery, she and her colleague/lover Charlie Holloway (Logan
Marshall-Green) emerge from hypersleep aboard the exploratory vessel Prometheus, just a scant few light years
away from the star system shown in the pictograms. They land on a seemingly
uninhabited world and, with several scientists and the ship’s crew, make their
way into a monolithic structure, with winding corridors and echoing chambers
that no natural formation could have produced. I can’t spoil much of what
happens from here on in, but needless to say what they find is not nearly anything
like what they expected. In fact, it’s far worse.
Where Alien and its two sequels (Alien: Resurrection never existed as far
as I’m concerned) had Lt. Ellen Ripley, Prometheus
has Elizabeth Shaw. She’s not cut from the same cloth as Ripley, being a scientist
rather than an officer, but is an interesting character nevertheless and is
perhaps better suited to the movie’s themes than a more action-oriented
protagonist would be. Unlike many heroes in the realm of sci fi, she is not
secular but a devout Christian, influenced by her missionary father and who, as
the film progresses, finds a way of reconciling her beliefs with the staggering
revelations she and her team uncover. And her pixie-ish appearance disguises an
almost primordial survival instinct. There’s an especially good example of this
bridging the middle and final acts of the movie, but it’s a sequence I don’t
want to spoil for anybody. It’s also perhaps the most horrifying scene ever put
to film. You won’t miss it when you see it. Trust me.
Though it’s been
said in practically every other review of the film, I have to impress just how
excellent Michael Fassbender is as David, the titular ship’s android and the
film’s secondary protagonist. By the time the audience is introduced to Prometheus’ congenial robot he’s already
at a highly advanced stage of his virtual development. While the crew slumbers
in cryogenic hibernation, David has been absorbing inconceivable quantities of
information, effectively turning him into an expert in every field. He even
manages to extrapolate the Engineers’ language based off of the syntax and
phonetics of several primitive human dialects. Every action he takes, every
move he makes is calculated, but not stiff, and though his precision is inhuman
it’s carried out with undeniable elegance: in one particularly humorous moment,
he rides his bicycle in circles along the perimeter of the ship’s gymnasium,
while simultaneously and effortlessly tossing a basketball into the net
one-handed.
But beneath his efficient
motions and immaculately-groomed features—based heavily on those of T.E.
Lawrence, whose fictionalized depiction in Lawrence
of Arabia David adores—is a complex mind with its own agenda. In his review of the film, Roger Ebert compares David to a walking HAL 9000 from 2001, and while this is a fair
juxtaposition it doesn’t do the former character justice. Hal’s story is about
ethical conflicts triggering a psychological breakdown; David’s motivations,
however, are much more elusive and can only be gleamed here and there from
snippets of dialogue, his interactions with the environment, and from one
monumental deception on his part that sets up much of the second half of the
film. After two viewings and countless discussions with friends, I think the
robot has ascended his hierarchy of needs and now only has to achieve self-actualization,
which he does, like his creators before him, by playing God.
While I’m giving
Rapace and Fassbender a lot of—admittedly well-deserved—praise, they stand out
rather than overshadow. I don’t think there’s a single bad or even weak
performance in the film. Idris Elba is hilarious as Janek, the ship’s
casually cheeky and Stephen Stills-obsessed captain. Marshall-Green’s Holloway
acts as a nice counterbalance to Shaw, mediating her faith with scepticism and
her excitement with well-intentioned frustration. Meredith Vickers (Charlize
Theron), the mission director, is initially cold and mechanical but the events
of the film peel away her layers, exposing a soul as rife with feelings of
inferiority and even regret as it is with unrelenting drive. And in spite of
being sheathed in Benjamin Button-worthy
old age makeup—really the movie’s only poor special effect—Guy Pearce is oddly
charming as the venture’s funder Peter Weyland. Rafe Spall, Sean Harris, Kate
Dickie and Benedict Wong round out the ship’s crew with characters that, while pretty
stock, are nevertheless witty and engaging.
Aesthetically
speaking, this is an unquestionably beautiful film. Taking cues from Syd Mead
and H.R. Giger’s old designs for Alien,
the artistic directors have crafted a detailed yet fully functional world. Like
the Nostromo before (well, after) it, every corner, every switch
and every bulkhead in the Prometheus
looks functional rather than stylistic. Best of all, Scott has refrained from
using an overabundance of computer generated imagery, as most blockbuster
directors are wont to do. Nearly every set has been physically built, and every
creature has been brought to life through practical effects, be it puppetry or
animatronics or, in the case of the Engineers themselves, by guys in suits. The
whole affair looks and feels more tangible than James Cameron’s Avatar could ever have hoped to be.
Visually and musically, this movie is perfect.
Where the film
actually falters is not in its characters or design or even the story as a
whole, but the connecting tissue—the very tendons of the plot—weakening and
even disappearing between scenes. The issue is rather sparse in the first and
middle acts, though a few eyebrows might be cocked at the sight of a couple of
scientists getting lost for no reason at all, but it comes to the fore as the
movie hurtles toward its climax. The Horrifying Sequence I hinted at earlier is
not even mentioned in the following scene, the characters and audience’s
attention quickly shifting to another plot point without a clutch. It’s
jarring, and it feels as though entire swaths of necessary dialogue were left
on the cutting room floor, and given how much Scott is likely to shave off his
films during the editing process—the original cut of Alien reportedly ran over four hours—I wouldn’t be surprised if
that was the case. It feels like he or some studio executive felt the final act
wasn’t moving fast enough and decided to cut several minutes off the running
time, regardless of how it affected the plot. Ironically, this tripped up both
me and much of the audience I’ve spoken with during the most pivotal moments of
the movie.
As well, it’s a
little more open ended than I would like. I wouldn’t say the trailers tricked
me into thinking the events of this film would directly set up everything in Alien but they gave me that impression
anyway. Without spoiling anything, the final few minutes set up not one but two
plotlines to be explored in a later film, and while I want to see where both
lead I can’t help but feel there’s something to be said for a self-contained
film. Both Alien and the original Star Wars can be appreciated in and of
themselves without needing sequels, but Prometheus’
ending only really allows for one option: forward. And unless the movie brings
in a fair bit of cash, I have doubts of seeing a second part in theatres a few
years from now.
But in spite of
these stumbles, at no point for me did the film ever fall flat on its face. It
is, in Gestalt fashion, greater than the sum of its parts, an elegant essay in
need of one more revision—or at least a few more transition sentences between
its later paragraphs. I’m not holding out for an extended cut, though the
notion of one does please me; Scott’s preferred versions of Blade Runner and Kingdom of Heaven are far and away superior to their theatrical
cuts. But for now, Prometheus is for
the large part what I hoped it to be and my favourite film of the year thus far
(no doubt The Dark Knight Rises will
knock it out of the top spot a few weeks from now). I just kind of wish the
writers had hit spell check once or twice before they handed it in.
1 comment:
Nice review David. I was entertained, to say the least, but I think I was expecting something so much better after all of the promotion for this flick. Maybe it was too much like Alien.
Post a Comment